Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Tseko (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per WP:G4. — CactusWriter (talk) 17:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ryan Tseko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Press consists of mentions, paid media, or otherwise unreliable sources. Sentences like "He is also active on social media, sharing insights into real estate investing, aviation, and wealth-building strategies" make this TNT worthy but I see a speedy was already declined. CNMall41 (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, United States of America, and Illinois. CNMall41 (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Arizona, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. As mentioned in the nom, while the press coverage may seem substantial on the surface, reading it reveals that it is largely either press releases, brief mentions, interviews, et cetera. Sourcing is definitely not at a level acceptable for a BLP, either. The article was also written by a WP:SPA, Jabotaave, indicating an undisclosed COI or possible paid editing for promotional purposes. nf utvol (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. As discussed above, lacking sources. This creator was a SPA, the creator of the page the first time around was a sockpuppet. tedder (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. I think this qualify for speedy deletion under G4.Instant History (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.