Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 November 26
Appearance
November 26
The result of the debate was move to Passages (album) and delete. —Doug Bell talk 02:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Unlikely search term, orphan, target article name is quite easy to find. Dar-Ape 19:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.The result of the debate was Speedy delete. —Doug Bell talk 02:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Recently created unnecessary cross-namespace redirect with no incoming links. WP:QUEEN already exists as a shortcut. Khatru2 05:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.The result of the debate was delete. —Doug Bell talk 02:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Redirects should quite simply not be abbreviations of expletives. This redirect can be replaced by WP:GPD, which has been around for over a month, and this should be long enough for users to be familiar with it. I also proposed this on the talk page and there were no objections. Furthermore, fewer than 10 pages currently link to this. Dar-Ape 01:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Keep. I have no idea what abbreviation you are talking about, but assuming there is one, that still is not a reason for deletion. I feel there's something I'm missing, though, could you clarify if I am? -Amarkov blahedits 06:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)- Oh, wow, I somehow thought that was an abbreviation for something in the title. Delete per nom, then. -Amarkov blahedits 15:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rofl. Delete per nom. Fredil 21:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Dunno. This is sounding like the debate with WP:NUKE... According to the nominator's logic, I guess WP:FUCK should be deleted as well for "redirects aren't profanity"... 170.215.83.4 00:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well it looks like WP:NUKE will be deleted as well and WP:FUCK has some relevancy to the article title in question unlike this one. --64.229.72.218 01:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)